「文革災難的民間版本，是用一種徹底失控的民粹主義，為平日遊蕩在街角、埋藏在心底的惡，提供一個發洩的機會，而且把這種發洩轉化為表演，轉化爲文化，轉化爲暴力。」
—《借我一生》，余秋雨。
本文描述了余秋雨的父親在文革時期被批鬥的經歷，以及他對批鬥者的觀察。這段描述不正是現今網路普及、人人都能表達的狀態嗎？
呼應今天閱讀《失控的同理心》這本書，紀錄幾個我印象深刻的重點：
- 理解不等於感受：憐憫與同理心不同之處在於當事人不一定共享了對方，而是對對方充滿溫暖、關懷、照顧的感受，且具有改善其狀態的強烈動機。憐憫是對目標保持情感，而不是與目標共享情感。
- 少點同理，多點慈愛：長期經驗到同理苦楚非常可能不利於健康。更多時候我們只是不想附和別人的負面情緒，免得自己也心情糟糕。亞當斯密更認為難過的人要有自覺，別人不一定想要同理，散播情緒時要有所節制。但我們可以透過冥想訓練，使人快速跳脫感同身受而來的苦，以慈悲心採取行動將其化解。
- 人類能夠批判自己，因此才有無窮可能性：同理心的意義更勝於道德，最顯而易見的是我們可以感受別人的喜悅。並非只有同理正面感受有意義，透過另一個人的角度觀察世界是種嶄新視野，即使那個人處於痛苦。多數人好奇別人的生活。模擬別人的感受既有趣也能改造自己。
更多時候，我們應該練習從別人身上看見自己，並且發自內心欣賞自己，因此真正快樂。
Most of the time, it’s important to genuinely appreciate ourselves, leading to a sense of true happiness.
I’ve established clear boundaries between my professional and personal relationships. A few months ago, I accepted a job offer that came with a heavy workload.
However, what troubled me the most was the blurred line between work and personal life. This experience has had a profound impact on me, strengthening my inner resilience.
In the past, I believed that demonstrating empathy was the hallmark of being a good friend. I feared that if I didn’t respond or offer help, others would perceive me as arrogant and cut ties.
However, I’ve come to realize that expressing my needs with kindness and clarity is crucial. Effective communication skills can significantly improve any situation.
By bravely and directly articulating my needs and how others can support me, I’ve found that things often unfold more smoothly than expected.
Light Seeker | 找到你的光 
發表留言